<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for KAHAR'S TANGENTS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arkahar.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Andres Kahar's (less personal) take on politics, culture &#38; other inconsequentials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:14:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Do Canucks hate freedom? by davecandoit</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/07/07/do-canucks-hate-freedom/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>davecandoit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/07/07/do-canucks-hate-freedom/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to attempt to &quot;give&quot; you an answer to the following statement: &quot;Canadians deserve a debate over the question: ‘Why are we in Afghanistan?’ The answer’s not a given.&quot;

While the Taliban were in power, little girls, children, would have a hand chopped off if caught carrying a book. Not reading it, not learning, but simply for the act of carrying one. The logic being that she &#039;might&#039; be reading it. We can&#039;t have that, now can we. That no longer happens there. We have put a stop to it. If people like Jack Layton ever get his way, Afghanistan will fall back into the hands of the Taliban and in five years or so we&#039;ll have to go back and stop them all over again. 

While the left-wingers of our society agonize about the meaning of &quot;support our troups,&quot; the right-wingers are busy stopping genocidal maniacs from destroying their country and culture and threatening their neighbours. Imagine a world where those who protest against war put as much time and effort protesting against genocide and brutal dictatorships. Remember the tens of thousands of protesters back in the mid-90s demanding we do something about Rwanda? Yeah, me neither, because there weren&#039;t any. Those left-wingers didn&#039;t give enough of a shit about Rwanda do drag their arses out of bed and make a statement. But the moment anyone raises a hand to one of these demonic regimes, the protesters drop their bongs and rush out in droves yapping like they actually have a clue.

North Korea stand as a shinning example of what happens when you choose to do nothing, save for pesky sanctions. Eisenhower placed sanctions on Cuba after Fidel overthrew the country. Here we are 50 years later waiting for them to have an effect. In the case of North Korea, any chance to save those millions of people from this despot nutjob is now gone, thanks to their development of nukes and long range missiles. And we sat back and did nothing. Michael Moore would be pleased. 

In June 1981 many nations were shocked and outraged when Israel bombed the Osirak nuclear facility near Baghdad; yet looking back on it, it was clearly the right decision, both for Israel and the rest of the western world. Dr. Imad Khadduri — Hussein’s top scientist involved in Iraq&#039;s nuclear program from 1968 to 1998 — claims there is little doubt Iraq would have developed nuclear weapons long ago, if not for Israel’s pre-emptive air strike. Imagine Hussein with nukes! 

Bottom line: Don&#039;t waste too much time hand wringing on the meaning of &quot;support our troups.&quot; Life&#039;s too short. People are being butchered every day in some faraway land. The tough question left-wingers should be asking themselves is this, why don&#039;t I give a rat&#039;s ass about the millions of deaths that occur each year under the iron-fisted rule of despot regimes?

As for the tired argument, why not leave it to the UN; we all know that&#039;s a monumental waste of time. The UN is virtually useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to attempt to &#8220;give&#8221; you an answer to the following statement: &#8220;Canadians deserve a debate over the question: ‘Why are we in Afghanistan?’ The answer’s not a given.&#8221;</p>
<p>While the Taliban were in power, little girls, children, would have a hand chopped off if caught carrying a book. Not reading it, not learning, but simply for the act of carrying one. The logic being that she &#8216;might&#8217; be reading it. We can&#8217;t have that, now can we. That no longer happens there. We have put a stop to it. If people like Jack Layton ever get his way, Afghanistan will fall back into the hands of the Taliban and in five years or so we&#8217;ll have to go back and stop them all over again. </p>
<p>While the left-wingers of our society agonize about the meaning of &#8220;support our troups,&#8221; the right-wingers are busy stopping genocidal maniacs from destroying their country and culture and threatening their neighbours. Imagine a world where those who protest against war put as much time and effort protesting against genocide and brutal dictatorships. Remember the tens of thousands of protesters back in the mid-90s demanding we do something about Rwanda? Yeah, me neither, because there weren&#8217;t any. Those left-wingers didn&#8217;t give enough of a shit about Rwanda do drag their arses out of bed and make a statement. But the moment anyone raises a hand to one of these demonic regimes, the protesters drop their bongs and rush out in droves yapping like they actually have a clue.</p>
<p>North Korea stand as a shinning example of what happens when you choose to do nothing, save for pesky sanctions. Eisenhower placed sanctions on Cuba after Fidel overthrew the country. Here we are 50 years later waiting for them to have an effect. In the case of North Korea, any chance to save those millions of people from this despot nutjob is now gone, thanks to their development of nukes and long range missiles. And we sat back and did nothing. Michael Moore would be pleased. </p>
<p>In June 1981 many nations were shocked and outraged when Israel bombed the Osirak nuclear facility near Baghdad; yet looking back on it, it was clearly the right decision, both for Israel and the rest of the western world. Dr. Imad Khadduri — Hussein’s top scientist involved in Iraq&#8217;s nuclear program from 1968 to 1998 — claims there is little doubt Iraq would have developed nuclear weapons long ago, if not for Israel’s pre-emptive air strike. Imagine Hussein with nukes! </p>
<p>Bottom line: Don&#8217;t waste too much time hand wringing on the meaning of &#8220;support our troups.&#8221; Life&#8217;s too short. People are being butchered every day in some faraway land. The tough question left-wingers should be asking themselves is this, why don&#8217;t I give a rat&#8217;s ass about the millions of deaths that occur each year under the iron-fisted rule of despot regimes?</p>
<p>As for the tired argument, why not leave it to the UN; we all know that&#8217;s a monumental waste of time. The UN is virtually useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do Canucks hate freedom? by fma7</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/07/07/do-canucks-hate-freedom/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>fma7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/07/07/do-canucks-hate-freedom/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>support the troops by saying no to our participation in wars of invasion and occupation. Also lets debunk these false myths of Canada as peacemaker,The Canadian government and the military would like us to believe that we are altruistic peacekeepers helping people around the world. But is this accurate? &#039;MYTHS FOR PROFIT&#039; examines how these misconception are maintained and who stands to gain by perpetuating them. By understanding the systems of power in Canada we can move forward in challenging how they operate and collectively create change. Please visit  http://www.wideopenexposure.com/M4P.php  to view this documentary
Want to see Canadian  pension plan contributions in the armaments industry and a list of  Canadian companies that have made cluster bombs that were illegally used in places like Lebanon or  former Yugoslavia or hardware parts used in the slaughter of Palestinainsin Gaza go to   http://coat.ncf.ca/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>support the troops by saying no to our participation in wars of invasion and occupation. Also lets debunk these false myths of Canada as peacemaker,The Canadian government and the military would like us to believe that we are altruistic peacekeepers helping people around the world. But is this accurate? &#8216;MYTHS FOR PROFIT&#8217; examines how these misconception are maintained and who stands to gain by perpetuating them. By understanding the systems of power in Canada we can move forward in challenging how they operate and collectively create change. Please visit  <a href="http://www.wideopenexposure.com/M4P.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.wideopenexposure.com/M4P.php</a>  to view this documentary<br />
Want to see Canadian  pension plan contributions in the armaments industry and a list of  Canadian companies that have made cluster bombs that were illegally used in places like Lebanon or  former Yugoslavia or hardware parts used in the slaughter of Palestinainsin Gaza go to   <a href="http://coat.ncf.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://coat.ncf.ca/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HISTORICAL CHUTZPAH #1,882:Vladimir Putin and &#8216;colonial thinking&#8217; by andro</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/07/25/historical-chutzpah-1882-vladimir-putin-and-colonial-thinking/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>andro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/07/25/historical-chutzpah-1882-vladimir-putin-and-colonial-thinking/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>but was Russia an actual &quot;colonial&quot; power? 

what actual &#039;colonies&#039; did they have?

as a cold warrior i&#039;m not suggesting that their imperial thrust didn&#039;t flow into the Warsaw Pact?

but &quot;colonial&quot;?
 that&#039;s more of a western European notion.

it may seem like a fine point,  but i caution you against easy concepts and knee-jerk catch-phrases when it comes to the Russian mind-- even those of us westerners who swim in the same gene pool don&#039;t have quite the same dark edge to our sensibilities-- we are mere iron to their steel in the absence of the refiner&#039;s fire.

was he being ironic in a sailor&#039;s uniform? i think so-- remember &quot;Mission Accomplished&quot; in  flight suit? Putin is a patient man.

in light of the current Ossetia situation, not only will Bush 43 do nothing to assist Georgia [who did provide ~2000 bodies for cannon fodder since returned to the motherland] because he needs to preserve Russia as an ally in re Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but was Russia an actual &#8220;colonial&#8221; power? </p>
<p>what actual &#8216;colonies&#8217; did they have?</p>
<p>as a cold warrior i&#8217;m not suggesting that their imperial thrust didn&#8217;t flow into the Warsaw Pact?</p>
<p>but &#8220;colonial&#8221;?<br />
 that&#8217;s more of a western European notion.</p>
<p>it may seem like a fine point,  but i caution you against easy concepts and knee-jerk catch-phrases when it comes to the Russian mind&#8211; even those of us westerners who swim in the same gene pool don&#8217;t have quite the same dark edge to our sensibilities&#8211; we are mere iron to their steel in the absence of the refiner&#8217;s fire.</p>
<p>was he being ironic in a sailor&#8217;s uniform? i think so&#8211; remember &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221; in  flight suit? Putin is a patient man.</p>
<p>in light of the current Ossetia situation, not only will Bush 43 do nothing to assist Georgia [who did provide ~2000 bodies for cannon fodder since returned to the motherland] because he needs to preserve Russia as an ally in re Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s slippery habits by Martin</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/05/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Pieces like Getting Iraq Wrong are sweet and quaint because they are all complicit in our national daydream -- that our president is following all of this conscientiously, that he cares, that his judgment and doctrine and legacy matter to him.

Reality check:  Religious ideals trump both academic ideas and political specifics. In religious life, there are no such things as false ideas but only actions ordained by an inscrutable god. So fuck Kant and his crooked timber. 

In the end, this  NYT Mag piece is a bunch of hand wringing over what might as well be a failed initiative not by Caligula, but his horse. As such, it has really pissed me off.

Notwithstanding a wickedly funny blog-take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pieces like Getting Iraq Wrong are sweet and quaint because they are all complicit in our national daydream &#8212; that our president is following all of this conscientiously, that he cares, that his judgment and doctrine and legacy matter to him.</p>
<p>Reality check:  Religious ideals trump both academic ideas and political specifics. In religious life, there are no such things as false ideas but only actions ordained by an inscrutable god. So fuck Kant and his crooked timber. </p>
<p>In the end, this  NYT Mag piece is a bunch of hand wringing over what might as well be a failed initiative not by Caligula, but his horse. As such, it has really pissed me off.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding a wickedly funny blog-take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s slippery habits by arkahar</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/05/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>arkahar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>You mean there really was an Isaiah before Berlin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean there really was an Isaiah before Berlin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s slippery habits by anonymous</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/05/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I think Iggy was talking about the prophet when he quoted Isaiah, no? Or you were joking? Your blog is funny and I never noticed the resemblance til now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Iggy was talking about the prophet when he quoted Isaiah, no? Or you were joking? Your blog is funny and I never noticed the resemblance til now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s slippery habits by Jack M</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/05/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Is interventionism a bad thing? Leaving dictators and harsh regimes undisturbed is not really progressive is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is interventionism a bad thing? Leaving dictators and harsh regimes undisturbed is not really progressive is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s slippery habits by Dave Bergeron</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/05/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bergeron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 09:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/michael-ignatieffs-sleazy-habits/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Great satire. Now that you point it out to me I can see the resemblance. Don&#039;t be too hard on &quot;Iggy&quot; because he was probably under Party pressure. As you suggest he should have written his article for The Globe or something Canadian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great satire. Now that you point it out to me I can see the resemblance. Don&#8217;t be too hard on &#8220;Iggy&#8221; because he was probably under Party pressure. As you suggest he should have written his article for The Globe or something Canadian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jon Stewart blitzes Wolf by arkahar</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/02/140/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>arkahar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/02/140/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Thanks, D. Yeah, &lt;i&gt;Newsroom&lt;/i&gt; remains one of my all-time TV faves. Even read the first season scripts, which were graciously printed and sold a few years back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, D. Yeah, <i>Newsroom</i> remains one of my all-time TV faves. Even read the first season scripts, which were graciously printed and sold a few years back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jon Stewart blitzes Wolf by Diane</title>
		<link>http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/02/140/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkahar.wordpress.com/2007/08/02/140/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I saw that instalment of TDS. Great stuff. The Newsroom ran on PBS a few years ago and I thought it was cool and smart. Speaking of smart I enjoy your blog. Ecclectic tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that instalment of TDS. Great stuff. The Newsroom ran on PBS a few years ago and I thought it was cool and smart. Speaking of smart I enjoy your blog. Ecclectic tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
